Legal Opinion · Dissent

Flournoy v. Sanders

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 17, 1995No. 1940007Published

1DissentAlmon, Justice

The circuit court in this action held that the judgment in the prior action between Sanders and Flournoy divested Raley and McCarron of any title they held in lot 6. In the prior action, Raley and McCarron were added as involuntary plaintiffs on Flournoy’s motion. They filed motions to dismiss, stating that they claimed no interest in lot 6:

“Mr. McCarron and Mr. Raley, along with Kenneth L. Sanders, executed a warranty deed dated August 31, 1984, ... conveying property known as the ‘Hudson Marina’ to one Frank J. Caron. The property described in [Sanders v. Flournoy, 640 So.2d 933 (Ala.1994),…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sanders v. FlournoySupreme Court of Alabama · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API