Furr v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.
Whether or not there is a constitutional and statutory right to counsel at a revocation hearing is the issue presented by this appeal. We find that where imposition of sentence is suspended and a defendant is placed on probation, there is a right to counsel at a subsequent revocation hearing. The case was transferred by the Court of Appeals under Sup. Ct. R. 29(4)(b).
The appellant, Vernell Furr, pleaded guilty on July 11, 1983, to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. His plea was taken under advisement by the court, which deferred…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
- Leak v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982
3Cited by6 opinions
- Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
- Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Jamar Conic v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
- Suire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
- Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.