Legal Opinion

Furr v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 25, 1985No. CR 85-23PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Jack Holt, Jr., Chief Justice.

Whether or not there is a constitutional and statutory right to counsel at a revocation hearing is the issue presented by this appeal. We find that where imposition of sentence is suspended and a defendant is placed on probation, there is a right to counsel at a subsequent revocation hearing. The case was transferred by the Court of Appeals under Sup. Ct. R. 29(4)(b).

The appellant, Vernell Furr, pleaded guilty on July 11, 1983, to possession of a controlled substance with intent to deliver. His plea was taken under advisement by the court, which deferred…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Hawkins v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1972
  4. Leak v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  5. Akins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Brooks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  3. Jamar Conic v. State of ArkansasCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2021
  4. Suire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1986
  5. Cook v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API