Legal Opinion

Conlon v. Marsh

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1916PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action to have two assignments of dower adjudged to have been given as collateral for certain loans, since paid, surrendered up and canceled.

1Opinion of the CourtHotchkiss, J.

Mrs. Conion, the plaintiff, sues to have two assignments of dower (a) from her to defendant Marsh and (b) from Marsh to defendant Hosier, each absolute in form and dated November 22, 1909, adjudged to have been given by her to Hosier as collateral for certain loans, since paid, and to have the several instruments surrendered up and canceled. The voluminous testimony and exhibits disclose a farrago of chicane, fraud and perjury, involving not alone the acts of Mrs. Conlon and the defendant Hosier, but as well the professional conduct of three members of the bar. Because I am loathe to say…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Dunham v. Hastings Pavement Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Bolt v. RogersNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  3. Robertson v. . SayreNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Simis v. SimisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  5. Sweet v. TinslarNew York Supreme Court · 1867

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Nielsen v. DonnellyCity of New York Municipal Court · 1920
  2. Conlon v. MarshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API