Legal Opinion

Conoco, Inc. v. Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes

District Court, D. Wyoming

Decided August 31, 1983No. C80-0181-K, C80-208-KPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KERR, District Judge.

These cases arise from an oil and gas severance tax imposed by the Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes upon oil companies producing oil and gas from land leased on the Wind River Indian Reservation. The specific facts giving rise to the case and the proceedings up to this point are set forth below.

The Shoshone and Arapahoe Tribes are federally recognized Indian tribes residing on the Wind River Indian Reservation and are beneficial owners of the mineral interests in the Reservation lands. Leases are granted to various oil companies for oil production on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. United States v. MazurieSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. Commonwealth Edison Co. v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mustang Fuel Corp. v. HatchDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API