Legal Opinion

Harris v. Reneau Inc

District Court, N.D. Alabama

Decided July 30, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00849Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ALABAMA SOUTHERN DIVISION CANDACE HARRIS, } } Plaintiff, } } v. } Case No.: 2:20-CV-00849-MHH } RENEAU, INC., } } Defendant } MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Candace Harris alleges that defendant Reneau, Inc. discriminated and retaliated against her in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq. and 42 U.S.C. §1981, as amended. Ms. Harris has asked the Court to enter default judgment against Reneau. (Doc. 18). A court may enter a default judgment when a defendant, after receiving proper notice of the…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
  2. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  3. Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Nishimatsu Construction Co., Ltd. v. Houston National Bank, Defendant-Third Party v. Jack D. Baize, Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1975
  5. Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African-American Owned MediaSupreme Court of the United States · 2020

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API