Legal Opinion

Fugler v. Daigle

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 19, 1989No. 89 CW 1038PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SAVOIE, Judge.

This is a tort suit. Plaintiffs, Karen H. Fugler and Roger Fugler, filed a petition naming as defendants Marvin Daigle, A.K. Durnin Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc. (A.K. Dur-nin), Colonial Penn Insurance Company, A.K. Durnin’s liability insurer, Dave Ether-idge and Darryl Edwards, employees of *16A.K. Durnin. Defendants A.K. Durnin, Colonial Penn Insurance Company, Dave Etheridge and Darryl Edwards (the dealership defendants) filed a motion fqr summary judgment, a motion to strike and an exception of no cause of action. The trial court denied the motions and overruled the exception. We…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sanborn v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1984
  2. Smith v. HowardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  3. Perkins v. DesrochersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  4. Toole v. Morris-Webb Motor Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1938
  5. Abernathy v. VarnadoLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hodges v. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Thelma M. Hodges v. Michael A. TaylorLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API