Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Russell

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 20, 1969PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReynolds, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualifying claimant from receiving benefits effective January 24, 1967 on the ground that he refused employment for which he was reasonably fitted by training and experience without good cause (Labor Law, § 593, subd. 2). Claimant had previously been employed by Freital Gratz Co., Inc., from February 4 to August 26, 1966 as a grinder but had quit work there after a dispute with his union, Teamsters Local 210, over the payment of certain disability benefits. Thereafter claimant worked in South Carolina from October to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MalaspinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
  2. In re the Claim of SpackNew York Court of Appeals · 1953

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Department of Labor v. Unemployment Insurance Appeal BoardSuperior Court of Delaware · 1972
  2. Dueweke v. Morang Drive Greenhouses, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API