Legal Opinion

Morrow v. Morrow

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 14, 1925No. 6 Div. 337PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, C. J.

It is settled by the decisions of this court that either for fraud in the procurement of the conveyance, or for a failure to comply with its terms and conditions, either precedent or subsequent, a conveyance, founded upon love and . affection, support, and maintenance, etc., may be annulled for a breach thereof. Ballenger v. Ballenger, 208 Ala. 147, 94 So. 127; Russell v. Carver, 208 Ala. 219, 94 So. 128. Indeed, this doctrine is not questioned in brief of appellant’s counsel, but it is contended that the bill fails to charge such a breach as would authorize an annulment of the deed. The bill…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wilks v. WilksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Russell v. CarverSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  3. Ballenger v. BallengerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Sipsey Coal Mining Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  2. Bush v. GreerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. Heartsill v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  4. Hunter v. WattersSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  5. People's Bank of Mobile v. BarretSupreme Court of Alabama · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API