Legal Opinion

Crawford v. Pituch

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 7, 1950No. Civ. No. 132PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

FOLLMER, District Judge.

Plaintiffs “claim damages in trespass from the Defendants”. It is alleged that plaintiffs were tenants of the defendants and that pursuant to the provisions of the Housing and Rent Act of 1947, as amended by the Housing and Rent Act of 1948, 50 U.S.C.A.Appendix, § 1881 et seq., defendants gave plaintiffs written notice “to vacate the said premises within 60 days on the ground that the Defendants desire the possession of the said premises for their own use and occupancy.” Plaintiffs further allege that defendants’ statements “were false, fradulent, (sic) wanton and…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fields v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Wells v. Universal Pictures Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
  3. Regents of New Mexico College of Agriculture & Mechanic Arts v. Albuquerque Broadcasting Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  4. Barnhart v. Western Maryland Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942
  5. Shipley v. Pittsburgh & L. E. R. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1947

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Crawford v. PituchSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API