Legal Opinion
Pierson v. M.B. Sturgis, Inc.
District Court, E.D. California
Decided November 19, 2024No. 1:23-cv-01778Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 MICHAEL PIERSON, et al., Case No. 1:23-cv-01778-JLT-EPG 11 Plaintiffs, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RECOMMENDING DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ 12 v. MOTION TO REMAND AND APPROVING DEFENDANT WORTHINGTON’S MOTION 13 M.B. STURGIS, INC., et al., FOR DETERMINATION OF GOOD FAITH SETTLEMENT 14 Defendants. (ECF Nos. 21, 65) 15 OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN 16 THIRTY DAYS 17 This products liability case proceeds on claims by Plaintiffs Michael Pierson, individually 18 and as successor-in-interest to the Estate of Katie Pierson,…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Lavonne BAXTER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Louis SULLIVAN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Frank D. Gaus v. Miles, Inc., an Indiana CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Caterpillar Inc. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.