Legal Opinion

Richerson v. Bearden

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 7, 1983No. 82-178PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant, a taxpayer, filed a complaint seeking a declaratory judgment. She pleaded that appellees had entered into a contract involving the sale of county property which constituted an illegal exaction in violation of Article 16, § 13 of the Constitution of Arkansas (1874). In response, appellees filed a motion for summary judgment which was accompanied by supporting affidavits. No counter-affidavits or other controverting evidence was offered by appellant. The trial court found that no genuine issue existed as to any fact, that appellees by their affidavits had…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Spickes v. Medtronic, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1982

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bell v. Crawford CountySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API