Legal Opinion

Palmer v. Cowdrey

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 15, 1873PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to District Court, Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtHallett, C. J.

Defendant in error filed Ms bill in the Arapahoe district court, on the 25th day of February, A. D. 1868, and the summons was made returnable to the *2ensuing May term of the court. Notice of the pendency of the suit was published in a newspaper as provided in section 8 of the act relating to chancery practice (K,. S. 93), and on the 30th day of March, and more than a month before the return day, the summons was returned non inventus. Plaintiff in error, failing to appear at the May term of the court, the bill was taken as confessed by her and a decree of foreclosure was passed. In this decree…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clinton v. EnglebrechtSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  2. Noonan v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1863
  3. Orchard v. Hughes. Id. v. IdSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  4. Dunphy v. Kleinsmith and DuerSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Himmelberger-Harrison Lumber Co. v. McCabeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  2. Ames v. Colorado Cent. R.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Colorado · 1877

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API