Board of Regents v. Ellis
Supreme Court of Kansas
1DissentThiele, J.
I dissent from the last sentence of paragraph 8 of the syllabus and the corresponding portion of the opinion for as I see it this court in reaching the conclusions there stated has failed to follow established rules of appellate practice, and to follow its own decisions. While I do not believe that adherence to the doctrine of stare decisis is always compelled, I do believe that former decisions should be adhered to in the absence of sound reason to the contrary and that if the former decisions are wrong and are not to be followed, the reasons why they are so should be pointed out and the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Menke v. DuweSupreme Court of Kansas · 1924
- Keeler v. LauerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
- Proctor Trust Co. v. NeihartSupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
- McCracken v. WrightSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
- State ex rel. Minnesota Loan & Trust Co. v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.