Legal Opinion

State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1933No. 23326PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The right of the state to bring an original action in quowarranto in this court was upheld when a demurrer to the petition was overruled in State, ex rel. Bettman, Atty. Genl., v. Miami Conservancy District, 125 Ohio St. 201 180 N.E. 893. We see no good reason for departing from the views there expressed.

A summary of the essential allegations of the petition is contained in the opinion cited. Suffice it to say here that the state claims to be the owner in fee simple of three described tracts of land in Mad River township, Montgomery county, Ohio, aggregating approximately 26.28 acres, which…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Conserv. Dist.Ohio Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Halluer v. EmighOhio Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API