Brandup v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Appeal by defendant from an order of the district court for "Wilkin county, Brown, J., presiding, refusing a new trial.
1Opinion of the CourtGilfillan, C. J.
Action on a policy of fire insurance, issued By defendant to plaintiff. The policy contained this condition : “If the assured shall have or shall hereafter make any other contract of insurance, whether valid or not, on the property hereby insured, or any part thereof, without the consent of the company written hereon, * * * this policy shall be void.” One of the defences was that after the issuance of this policy, the plaintiff procured the issuance, by the ’Continental Insurance Company, of a policy insuring the .same property, of which defendant had no knowledge or *394notice, and to which it…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sandford v. HandyNew York Supreme Court · 1840
- Malleable Iron Works v. Phœnix InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
3Cited by18 opinions
- Parsons, Rich & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Kausal v. Minnesota Farmers' Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Western Nat. Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Batchelder v. Queen InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1883
- Andrus v. Maryland Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.