City of Birmingham v. Kircus
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtSamford, J.
It is now the established law of this state, based on ‘“reason, demanded by justice and supported by a preponderance of authority,” that a municipal corporation acts ministerially, and is responsible for actual damages caused by the careless and negligent manner in which it discharges its dúty in erecting and maintaining sewers and drains for the control of water falling or flowing on its streets. City Council of Montgomery v. Gilmer et al., 33 Ala. 116, 70 Am. Dec. 562. And it has many times been held by this court and by the Supreme Court that negligence in the performance of a duty charged…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Birmingham Railway, Light & Power Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1911
- City Council of Montgomery v. Gilmer & TaylorSupreme Court of Alabama · 1858
- Humes v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- City Council v. TownsendSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Sloss-S. S. & I. Co. v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Poffenbarger v. Merit Energy Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- City of Birmingham v. GreerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1930
- Sisco v. City of HuntsvilleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- City of Birmingham v. NorwoodAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929
- Poffenbarger v. Merit Energy Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2007