Legal Opinion

Miller v. Varilek

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1982No. Docket 54679PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Plaintiffs appeal as of right from an October 24, 1980, order denying their motion for relief from judgment.

Plaintiffs purchased lakefront property from defendants. Upon taking possession, plaintiffs discovered that the toilet overflowed when flushed. An inspection of the property disclosed that the septic system was inoperable because the water level in the area of the drain field was only 16 inches below ground level. According to county standards, the bottom of a drain bed was required to be four feet above the ground water level. Defendants do not dispute that the septic system was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cooper v. Automotive Finishes, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Jachim v. CoussensMichigan Court of Appeals · 1979
  3. Lenawee County Board of Health v. MesserlyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bynum v. ESAB Group, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Coolman v. D B Snider, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Miller v. VarilekMichigan Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Britton v. ParkinMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API