Legal Opinion
Keichel v. Wendt (In re Wendt)
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 5, 2004No. Bankruptcy No. 03-24103; Adversary No. 03-1100PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF OPINION AND ORDER
RANDOLPH BAXTER, Chief Judge.
In this adversary proceeding, Ryan Cramer, a co-defendant in the above-referenced adversary, seeks dismissal of the Plaintiffs’ amended complaint against him. Cramer contends that the Plaintiffs, Joseph A. Keichel and Shelley Keichel (“Kei-chels”) commenced a state court action in July of 2003 alleging a similar cause of action. He moved to dismiss the claim against him in the state court action1. The state court granted dismissal on October 8, 2003.2
Cramer seeks dismissal of the amended adversary complaint citing to Ohio Rule of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Deborah W. Kane and Andrew Kane v. Magna Mixer Company and Paul L. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
- Wilton E. Heyliger v. State University and Community College System of Tennessee, Allen Spritzer and John SmithCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Sill v. Sweeney (In Re Sweeney)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- McCart v. Jordana (In Re Jordana)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 1999
- Gilbraith v. HixsonOhio Supreme Court · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Loy v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. (In re Loy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 2016