Legal Opinion

Knapp Co. v. Saul

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 14, 1921No. Appeal, No. 85Published

Appeal, No. 85, April T., 1921, by defendant, from order of C. P. Allegheny County, Oct. T., 1920, refusing an appeal from county court in the case of Knapp Co., Inc., v. Harry J. Saul, Trading as Keystone Tire Co., Appellant. Petition to allow an appeal from the county court. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. The court dismissed the petition. Defendant appealed. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

Plaintiff, a foreign corporation, sued defendant in the County Court of Allegheny County to recover for merchandise sold and delivered defendant at his special instance and request. Defendant resisted payment on the ground that plaintiff, though not registered as required by the Act of June 8,1911, P. L. 710, as amended by the Act of April 22, 1915, P. L. 170, was doing business in Pennsylvania in violation of that act.

The evidence as to the facts was conflicting, and did not conclusively establish a doing of business by the *57plaintiff within this State, and therefore it…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Diamond Power Specialty Co. v. MilneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API