Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Perdue

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided March 21, 1888No. 12,969PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

The appellants allege in their complaint that *208they recovered judgments against Calvin R. Perdue; that executions were'issued on the several judgments and returned no property found; that Wyatt W. Wick is indebted to Per-due in the sum of one thousand dollars, evidenced by a promissory note executed by Wick to him ; that Perdue is insolvent; that the money due from Wick is subject to execution ; that the note was assigned to Charles W. Royse by Perdue for the purpose of cheating and defrauding his creditors ; that Royse placed the note in the hands of a partnership, known as the Bank of Salem.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Hutchinson v. TrauermanIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Seibert v. MilliganIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Franklin National Bank v. WhiteheadIndiana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Hutchinson v. First National Bank of Michigan CityIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Voorhees v. CarpenterIndiana Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Jewett v. PerretteIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API