Legal Opinion
Haines v. United Security Insurance Co.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided October 11, 1979No. 79CA0413PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULAND, Judge.
Plaintiffs, William and Mabel Haines, and Dale and Mary Tubbs, appeal from a summary judgment dismissing their property damage insurance claims against defendants, United Security Insurance Company and United Fire and Casualty Company. The judgment was made final for purposes of appeal pursuant to C.R.C.P. 54(b). We affirm.
The. facts are not in dispute. On July 5, 1977, heavy rainfall entered a sewer line being constructed by the City of Denver near plaintiffs’ residences. As a result, excessive pressure in the line caused raw sewage to be discharged into the basements.
As of…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Security Mutual Casualty Company v. Century Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- World Fire & Marine Ins. v. Carolina Mills Distributing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1948
- Koncilja v. Trinity Universal Insurance CompanyColorado Court of Appeals · 1974
- Urtado v. Allstate Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Colorado · 1974
- Hallsted v. Blue Mountain Convalescent Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Adams-Arapahoe Joint School District No. 28-J, Cross-Appellant v. The Continental Insurance Company, a Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Florida Farm Bureau Ins. Co. v. BirgeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Old Dominion Ins. Co. v. Elysee, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992
- Rodin v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Cardio Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.