Legal Opinion

Crumbley v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 12, 1995No. 95-673PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

661 So.2d 383 (1995)

Milton Amos CRUMBLEY, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 95-673.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

October 12, 1995.

Appellant, pro se.

No appearance by the state.

WOLF, Judge.

Crumbley appeals from a summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief. We find that the reasons the trial court gave for summary denial were insufficient, and reverse and remand so that the trial court may hold an evidentiary hearing or attach those portions of the record which demonstrate that appellant is not entitled to relief.

In pertinent part, appellant's motion…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. NeilSupreme Court of Florida · 1984
  2. Floyd v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1990
  3. Bowden v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. Murphy v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. BouchardDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
  2. State v. ChattinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Chattin v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001
  5. Dwyer v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API