Legal Opinion

Moyers v. Fogarty

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 19, 1909PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from Pottawattamie District Gourt. — Hon. O. D. Wheeler, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for breach of contract. There was judgment for the defendant -upon a directed verdict, and plaintiff appeals. —

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

— The plaintiff’s alleged causes of action are stated in eight separate counts of his petition which are, in substance, as follows: Count 1 declares upon a written contract or order, dated June 2, .1898, alleged to have been made between him and D. J. Fogarty acting by an agent for the purchase of fifty-three apple trees, and some minor items of other trees and plants. Count 2 declares upon a similar contract dated June 16, 1898, for the purchase of one thousand apple trees. Count 3 is upon a similar contract dated January 20, 1900, for the purchase of four thousand cherry trees. Count 4 is…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Eadie, Guilford & Co. v. AshbaughSupreme Court of Iowa · 1876
  2. Elwell v. . ChamberlinNew York Court of Appeals · 1864
  3. State v. MewherterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1877
  4. Lull v. Anamosa National BankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
  5. Romberg v. HughesNebraska Supreme Court · 1886

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Colman v. HeidenreichIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  2. In Re Estate of StratmanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  3. Carpenter v. LothringerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
  4. Crawford v. RaibleSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  5. State v. KluteSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API