Legal Opinion

Ames Trust & Sav. Bank v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided May 13, 1949No. Docket No. 14982PublishedCited by 21 opinions

Outstanding obligations evidenced by "certificates of deposit" issued by petitioner bank, not subject to check, bearing interest, and payable only at maturities of 6 months and 1 year, held includible in borrowed capital under section 719, Internal Revenue Code, for purposes of computing petitioner's excess profits credit. Economy Savings & Loan Co., 5 T.C. 543.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

OppeR, Judge-.

That the instruments in controversy were certificates of indebtedness within the meaning of section 719, Internal Revenue Code,1 follows from the holding in Economy Savings & Loan Co., 5 T. C. 543, reviewed other issues (C. C. A., 6th Cir.), 158 Fed. (2d) 472. That case, as this, involved a certificate of deposit, and respondent relied upon the definition contained in Regulations 112, sec. 35.719-1:

The term “certificate of indebtedness” includes only instruments having the general character of investment securities issued by a corporation as distinguishable from…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Economy Sav. & Loan Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1945
  2. West Constr. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1946
  3. Brann & Stuart Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1947
  4. Kellogg Com. Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Ames Trust & Sav. BankCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
  2. Capital Nat'l Bank v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  3. National Bank of Commerce v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  4. Valley Morris Plan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1959
  5. Hunt Foods, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API