Legal Opinion

Anschutz Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Commission

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1996No. 95-279PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GOLDEN, Justice.

The Anschutz Corporation (Anschutz) appeals from the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s (Commission) compulsory pooling order entered in Docket 183-95, pooling Anschutz’s non-consenting interest with all consenting interests in the proposed UPRC 11-3 well in the Yellow Creek Field. We affirm.

ISSUES

Appellant Anschutz presents the following issues:

1. Whether the force pooling order entered in Docket No. 183-95 violated the correlative rights of the Anschutz Corporation.

2. Whether the force pooling order entered in Docket No. 183-95 is fatally defective because it is…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Big Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. WYOMING OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSIONWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
  4. Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1977

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Squillace v. Wyoming State Employees' & Officials' Group Insurance Board of AdministrationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Exaro Energy Iii, Llc v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and Jonah Energy, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
  3. Moncrief v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Squillace v. Wyoming State Employees' & Officials' Group Insurance Board of AdministrationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API