Anschutz Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation Commission
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
GOLDEN, Justice.
The Anschutz Corporation (Anschutz) appeals from the Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission’s (Commission) compulsory pooling order entered in Docket 183-95, pooling Anschutz’s non-consenting interest with all consenting interests in the proposed UPRC 11-3 well in the Yellow Creek Field. We affirm.
ISSUES
Appellant Anschutz presents the following issues:
1. Whether the force pooling order entered in Docket No. 183-95 violated the correlative rights of the Anschutz Corporation.
2. Whether the force pooling order entered in Docket No. 183-95 is fatally defective because it is…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Pan American Petroleum Corp. v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1968
- Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1996
- Big Piney Oil & Gas Co. v. WYOMING OIL & GAS CONSERVATION COMMISSIONWyoming Supreme Court · 1986
- Union Pacific Resources Co. v. Texaco, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
- Larsen v. Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Squillace v. Wyoming State Employees' & Officials' Group Insurance Board of AdministrationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997
- Exaro Energy Iii, Llc v. Wyoming Oil and Gas Conservation Commission and Jonah Energy, LlcWyoming Supreme Court · 2020
- Moncrief v. Wyoming Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionWyoming Supreme Court · 1999
- Squillace v. Wyoming State Employees' & Officials' Group Insurance Board of AdministrationWyoming Supreme Court · 1997