United States v. Joseph Demarco
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves double jeopardy and collateral estoppel claims. The district court held that the government could put the appellant to trial, on substantive charges of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2314, even though in an earlier trial, appellant was acquitted of conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The district court also held that the government could use the same time period as covered in the earlier conspiracy trial, with one condition: that the government not introduce in the substantive offense trial evidence seeking to prove that the appellant conspired to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Lawton Scott MockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Charles D. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- United States v. Lawton Scott MockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
3Cited by16 opinions
- David Ross Delap, Sr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
- Willingham v. LoughnanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Darrell G. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
- United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Binyamin OhayonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
- State v. AparoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.