Legal Opinion

United States v. Joseph Demarco

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided June 16, 1986No. 84-5885PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:

This appeal involves double jeopardy and collateral estoppel claims. The district court held that the government could put the appellant to trial, on substantive charges of violating 18 U.S.C. § 2314, even though in an earlier trial, appellant was acquitted of conspiring to violate 18 U.S.C. § 2314. The district court also held that the government could use the same time period as covered in the earlier conspiracy trial, with one condition: that the government not introduce in the substantive offense trial evidence seeking to prove that the appellant conspired to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ashe v. SwensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. United States v. Lawton Scott MockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Charles D. GriggsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  4. United States v. Lawton Scott MockCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. David Ross Delap, Sr. v. Richard L. Dugger, Secretary, Department of Corrections, State of FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
  2. Willingham v. LoughnanCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. Darrell G. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1993
  4. United States of America, Cross-Appellee v. Binyamin OhayonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007
  5. State v. AparoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API