Jury Service Resource Center v. De Muniz
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGillette, J.
This matter requires us to determine the extent to which the data compiled and used by various public entities and officers in the process of selecting trial juries may be obtained by a member of the public. Plaintiffs, as members of the public, 1 initially sought to gain access to that information (hereinafter collectively referred to as “jury pool records”) by requesting it from the Oregon Judicial Department, which uses the data to compile the lists from which trial juries are chosen. When their requests were unsuccessful, plaintiffs filed the present case in circuit court. The circuit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richmond Newspapers, Inc. v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Globe Newspaper Co. v. Superior Court, County of NorfolkSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., County of RiversideSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mills v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- State v. MacBaleOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- JURY SERVICE RESOURCE CENTER v. MunizOregon Supreme Court · 2006
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Joseph Wood, III v. Charles RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.