Legal Opinion

Ostrander v. Okerlund

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 5, 1931No. 23257. Department TwoPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This is an action to enforce labor claims brought by respondent upon one claim of his own and three others assigned to him for collection.

There is little dispute as to the facts in this case. In May, 1930, appellants R. J. Okerlund & Co., a co-partnership, entered into a contract with School District No. 74 of King county for the construction of a school building, and furnished a bond with appellant Great American Indemnity Co., a corporation, as surety for the performance of the contract. Thereafter, Okerlund & Co. sublet a portion of the work, the plastering, to one H. A. Sample as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. John Dower Lumber Co. v. New Amsterdam Casualty Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Nelson & Castrup v. CulverWashington Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Stewart Lumber Co. v. Unique Home Builders, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. G. R. Sponaugle & Sons, Inc. v. McKnight Construction Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1973
  2. Thrifty Supply Co. of Seattle, Inc. v. Deverian Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API