Legal Opinion

Keeler v. Bell

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1905Published

Action by Samuel C. Keeler against Helena S. Bell.

1Opinion of the CourtForbes, J.

This is an action to recover for services performed as a referee in an action in the Supreme Court. After several days’ hearing and numerous adjournments, in which there was no evidence taken by the referee, the attorneys in that action terminated the case by stipulation for a judgment in favor of the plaintiff in that action. A judgment was entered against the defendant in the action, together with the costs and disbursements up to the time of the stipulation. This arrangement was made without the knowledge or consent of the referee. In the entry of the judgment the referee’s fees were…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. MacKnight Flintic Stone Co. v. Mayor of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
  2. Bonynge v. . FieldNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Clark v. . the Mayor, C. of New-YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Vandegrift v. . Cowles Engineering Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  5. Little v. . LynchNew York Court of Appeals · 1885

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API