Legal Opinion

In re G.O.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2000No. 87476PublishedCited by 207 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Rathje

The State appeals from an order of the appellate court holding that respondent, G.O., is entitled to a jury trial and that respondent’s confession was involuntary. See 304 Ill. App. 3d 719. We vacate the appellate court’s holding that respondent is entitled to a jury trial and reverse the holding that respondent’s confession was involuntary.

BACKGROUND

The State, relying upon a theory of accountability, filed a petition in the circuit court of Cook County to adjudicate respondent delinquent for the first degree murder (720 ILCS 5/9 — 1(a)(1), (a)(2) (West 1998)) of Rafael Kubera. Respondent…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Illinois v. WardlowSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. New York v. BeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by207 opinions

  1. People v. SorensonIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. SutherlandIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
  3. People v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 2004
  4. People v. MorganIllinois Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. NicholasIllinois Supreme Court · 2006

202 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API