State v. J. Watts Kearny & Sons
Supreme Court of Louisiana
1Opinion of the Court
LAND, Justice.
These cases have been consolidated for trial, as the issues involved in each are the same.
The state has proceeded by rule in each ease to collect from defendants, appellants, a retail license tax for the years 1929, 1930, 1931, and 1932, together with 2 per cent, per month interest on the amount claimed for *78each year from March 1st, and 10 per cent, attorney’s fees on the total amount of principal and interest.
The defense in each case is a denial that defendant is liable for a retail license tax. Defendants ayer that they are engaged in the .business of selling building…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Houghton v. PayneSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Norris Bros. v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1856
- Commonwealth v. CampbellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1859
- State v. RosenbaumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1907
- Commonwealth v. VetterleinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1906
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Claiborne Sales Company v. Collector of RevenueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Townsend Electric Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1952
- Claiborne Sales Company v. Collector of RevenueSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Townsend Electric Co. v. EvansTennessee Supreme Court · 1952