Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Ulrick v. Sanchez

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided December 27, 1926No. Nos. 3079, 3102Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

WATSON, J.

Appellant Ulrick has moved for a rehearing. I am authorized to say that Mr. Justice BICKLEY concurs with me in overruling the motion.'

When the original decision was announced, I was content merely to concur in the affirmance. In view of the importance of the questions discussed, both originally and on the motion, and since I am not entirely in accord with the views expressed by either of my brothers, I have concluded that it is incumbent upon me to state my position.

The CHIEF JUSTICE holds that the Constitution does not confer power on the Governor to remove…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wilcox v. People ex rel. LipeIllinois Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Roberts v. People Ex Rel. HicksSupreme Court of Colorado · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API