Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bickford v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 29, 1981No. 372-79CPublished

1ConcurrenceNichols, Judge

I fully agree with the court that the instant claim is without merit, if we have jurisdiction to address it. I also agree that we do have such jurisdiction, but my grounds for so stating differ slightly from those of the court.

Plaintiff was on active military service until 1980, and according to the terms of 50 U.S.C. app. § 525, he had 6 years after his separation date to sue on any claim against the United States that accrued during his military service. Edmonston v. United States, 140 Ct.Cl. 199, 155 F.Supp. 553 (1957); Berry v. United States, 130 Ct.Cl. 33, 126 F.Supp. 190 (1954), cert.…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Church of the Holy Trinity v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Deering v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1980
  4. O'Callahan v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1971
  5. Albert H. Grisham v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1968

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API