Legal Opinion

Faber v. Gold

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 6, 1990No. Nos. 89-862, 89-1139Published

1Per curiam

The trial court properly entered summary judgment for the appellees on the ground that the statute of limitations barred the claims asserted. See Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Ins. Corp., 478 So.2d 423 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985); Gaines v. Treasure Salvors, Inc., 352 So.2d 929 (Fla. 3d DCA 1977); Meyer v. Roth, 189 So.2d 515 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966), cert. denied, 198 So.2d 29 (Fla.1967). We do not consider the other grounds advanced for affirmance.

Affirmed.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dovenmuehle, Inc. v. LAWYERS TITLE INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. Meyer v. RothDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Meyer v. RothSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  4. Gaines v. Treasure Salvors, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1977