Legal Opinion
Scheimer v. NATIONAL CAPITAL REGION, NPS
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided May 2, 1990No. Civ. A. 89-971 SSHPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
STANLEY S. HARRIS, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendant National Capital Region, National Park Service’s (NPS) motion to dismiss and plaintiffs motion to amend the complaint. Plaintiff was riding his bike along a bicycle path within the jurisdiction of the NPS. Defendant Stotland was also riding on that path, going the opposite direction. The bicycles collided and plaintiff was injured. Plaintiff filed a claim with the NPS on June 14, 1988. On October 11, 1988, plaintiff received a final denial of his claim. He also was notified that he had six months in…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schiavone v. FortuneSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harold B. Hughes and Nancy J. Hughes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
- Angela M. Stewart, a Minor by Mary Stewart, Her Mother and Next Friend v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- Sprecher v. GraberCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Stewart v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ryan v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2002
- Johnson v. American Samoa GovernmentHigh Court of American Samoa · 1998
- Murphy v. CooperDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2025