Legal Opinion

Ragland Coal Co. v. Spencer

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided October 3, 1922Published

1Opinion of the Court

MilleR, Judge:

The plaintiff complains of the decree of partition, ordering a sale of the property in accordance with the prayer of the bill, and finding in accordance with the report of the commissioners appointed, that the property was not conveniently susceptible of partition in kind.

The three assignments of error in the decree are: First, that the court did not before decreeing a sale of the property fix the respective interests or shares of the parties in the proceeds of the sale; Second, that the court directed the commissioners to whom the cause was referred to report the amount due…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Croston v. MaleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Strayer v. LongSupreme Court of Virginia · 1890
  3. George v. HessWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Helmick v. KraftWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API