Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. City of Charlotte

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 4, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaRNHiix, J.

The defendant city is authorized to make street improvements under the general law and by the express terms of its charter. The provision in its charter that “Where permanent street improvements shall be made, the property bearing such assessment shall not be so assessed again until after the expiration of ten years from the date of the last preceding assessment,” is a limitation of power which may be waived by property owners. Charlotte v. Alexander, 173 N. C., 515; Shepard v. Barron, 194 U. S., 553; Elliott on Roads and Streets, Yol. 2, paragraph 733; Wright v. Davidson, 181 U. S., 371;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wight v. DavidsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Shepard v. BarronSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
  3. City of Seattle v. HillWashington Supreme Court · 1900
  4. City of Charlotte v. AlexanderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  5. Cummings v. KearneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Evans, Et Ux. v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  2. Jones v. City of AshevilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API