Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Morelli-Hoskins Ford, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 16, 1992No. 1789Published

1Opinion of the Court

415 Pa. Superior Ct. 431 (1992)

609 A.2d 828

Curtis W. REEVES, Appellant,

v.

MORELLI-HOSKINS FORD, INC., and Ford Motor Company.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued January 22, 1992.

Filed June 16, 1992.

Joseph L. Higgins, West Chester, for appellant.

Elizabeth A.C. Venditta, Philadelphia, for appellee.

Before McEWEN, BECK and KELLY, JJ.

BECK, Judge:

The issue is whether under the Lemon Law the manufacturer of an allegedly defective car has a duty to refund the full purchase price to the buyer of the car where the car has been repossessed by the bank that financed the purchase of the car as a result…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thompson Coal Co. v. Pike Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Pennsylvania Gas & Water Co. v. Nenna & Frain, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Fox v. GablerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  5. Ford Motor Credit Co. v. DunsmoreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API