State ex rel. Leche v. Waggner
Supreme Court of Louisiana
APPEAL from the Twenty-Sixth District Court, Parish of Jefferson. Rost, J. 1. On an exception of xxo cause of action and vagueness, documents annexed to the petition must be considered. 27 Axx. 224; 30 An. 1148. 2. Oix motion to quash venire for any irregularity, fraud or irreparable injury must be alleged and proved. 84 An. 118; Act 1877, 3sTo. 44, Sec. 10; 83 An. 1414; 88 An. 460. 8. The fact that there are names of persons disqualified in the venire box will not vitiate…
Read the full summary
APPEAL from the Twenty-Sixth District Court, Parish of Jefferson. Rost, J. 1. On an exception of xxo cause of action and vagueness, documents annexed to the petition must be considered. 27 Axx. 224; 30 An. 1148. 2. Oix motion to quash venire for any irregularity, fraud or irreparable injury must be alleged and proved. 84 An. 118; Act 1877, 3sTo. 44, Sec. 10; 83 An. 1414; 88 An. 460. 8. The fact that there are names of persons disqualified in the venire box will not vitiate the drawing. 32 An. 84. 4. In suits under Article 200, Constitution of 1879, the method of drawing and summoning special…
1Opinion of the Court
*57The opinion of the court was delivered by
Watkins, J.
Under the authority of Articles 196, 200 and 201 of-the Constitution, the District Attorney of the Twenty-sixth Judicial District instituted this suit against the respondent as Sheriff of the-Parish of Jefferson, one of the parishes composing that district, for-his amotion or removal from office.
On the authority of Act 185 of 1880, the plaintiff prayed that a. special jury be ordered to try the case, and the jury selected returned a verdict in favor of the relator, and from a judgment of removal the respondent has appealed.
Preliminary to the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Green v. Dakin & DakinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1840