Legal Opinion

Mullas v. Secretary of State

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided April 23, 1971No. Docket 9747PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtO’Hara, J.

Plaintiff began this action in the nature of a suit for a declaratory judgment. She sought an adjudication of her right to proceed against the Secretary of State as custodian of the Motor Vehicle Accident Claims Fund.* 1

In substance, her complaint asserted that though her notice of intent to claim against the Fund was not formally filed within the six-month period from the date of the accrual of her cause of action, she had substantially complied with the statute within that period, and, additionally, that any failure of strict compliance was caused by the actions of the custodian of the Fund.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Meredith v. City of MelvindaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Jackson v. City of Detroit Board of EducationMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. Stacey v. SankovichMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lisee v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hussey v. City of Muskegon HeightsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Dover & Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Dover & Co. v. United Pacific InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Lisee v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1972

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API