Gunnin v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Pannbll, Judge.
1. Upon proper construction of the Act of 1951 (Ga. L. 1951, p. 214; Code Ann. § 59-705) the defendant has a right, after the usual voir dire questions have been put to the jury by the court, to individually question all jurors on the entire panel prior to interposing a challenge to any of them. The trial judge has no discretion in the matter, and his denial of this right to the defendant is reversible error. Blount v. State, 214 Ga. 433 (3) (105 SE2d 304); Ferguson v. State, 218 Ga. 173 (126 SE2d 798); Britten v. State, 221 Ga. 97, 100 (143 SE2d 176).
2. “While the questions…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Britten v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1965
- Atlanta Joint Terminals v. KnightCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
- Ferguson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1962
- Blount v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- McCann v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
- Hart v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
- Teems v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1982
- Bowens v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
- Lackey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1967
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.