Legal Opinion

Thompson v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 16, 1895No. 574PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the Criminal District Court of Galveston. Tried below before Hon. E. D. Gavin. This is an appeal from a judgment final for $500 on a forfeited bail bond. Judgment was rendered against each of the defendants for $500, which was the amount of the penalty in the bond. Ho further statement necessary.

1Opinion of the Court

HENDERSON, Judge.

This is a scire facias ease. It is contended by the appellants, the Sureties on the bail bond, that there is a variance between the name of the principal on the bail bond and that in the scire facias; that W. F. Thampson was the principal in the bail bond, and that the scire facias has the name of W. F. Thompson, thus constituting the variance. We have before us the original bail or appearance bond,' and it shows beyond any question that the name of the principal therein, as written, was W. F. Thompson, and not Thampson; hence there was no variance between the scire facias…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. General Bonding & Casualty Ins. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Stallings v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1915
  4. Dunn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  5. Browne v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API