Legal Opinion
Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 4, 1988PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Elliott Wilk, J.
Plaintiff moves to reargue defendant New York Higher Education Assistance Corporation’s (NYHEAC) motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.
By order dated December 4, 1987 (see, 138 Misc 2d 932), I *230held that the action against NYHEAC was improperly brought in the Supreme Court as NYHEAC was an entity so closely linked with State functions that it should be immunized from suit pursuant to Belscher v New York State Teachers’ Retirement Sys. (45 AD2d 206 [4th Dept 1974]).
Plaintiff moves to reargue on the grounds that I erred (1) in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Quaglia v. INC. VILL. OF MUNSEY PARKNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Belscher v. New York State Teachers' Retirement SystemAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- McCormick v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Littanzi v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Bell v. New York Higher Education Assistance Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bell v. New York State Higher Education Services Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Bell v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000