Legal Opinion · Concurrence

United States v. Brooks

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 29, 1981No. ACM S25267Published

1ConcurrenceMiller, Judge

Despite my dissent in United States v. Schmenk, 11 M.J. 803 (A.F.C.M.R.1981), I fully concur with the majority’s opinion. In Schmenk, supra, matters were presented to the convening authority that were regulatorily prohibited from being presented during any portion of criminal proceedings. No such prohibition existed here.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. SchmenkU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981