Legal Opinion

In Re Nathan F.

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided December 11, 2000No. 99-302-AppealPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

The respondents, Suzanne Frigon (Fri-gon) and Brian Frechette (Frechette), appeal from a Family Court decree terminating their parental rights to their children, Nathan (born May 23, 1994) and Kyle (born December 19, 1995). Frigon contends that the trial justice erred in finding her unfit as a parent because of her chronic substance abuse and in finding that the Department of Children, Youth, and Families (DCYF) had expended reasonable efforts to reunify her with her children. Frechette is pursuing his appeal pro se but has not filed any prebriefing statement or other written memoranda…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re Kristen B.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1989
  2. In Re Nicole B.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  3. In Re Antonio G.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1995
  4. In Re Tinisha P.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1997
  5. In re Jovanny R.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Jose Luis R.H.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009
  2. In Re Shaylon J.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  3. In re Briann A.T.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2016
  4. Com. v. McShane, S.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. In Re Jose Luis RHSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API