Legal Opinion · Dissent

Houston v. Wireman

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 21, 1982No. 2-382A80Published

1DissentSullivan, Judge

I dissent.

The dismissal of plaintiff’s lawsuit was clearly erroneous. T.R. 41(E) requires the trial court to conduct a hearing prior to entering a dismissal. At such hearing the plaintiff is entitled to demonstrate good cause for his failure to prosecute or otherwise comply with the Rules of Trial Procedure. No hearing was scheduled or conducted. Appellee properly preserved and presented the error by resort to Trial Rule 60. See State ex rel. Janesville Auto Transport Co. v. Superior Court of Porter County (1979) Ind., 387 N.E.2d 1330.

The procedural posture of this appeal in light of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  2. PM Gas & Wash Co., Inc. v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1978
  3. Warner v. Young America Volunteer Fire DepartmentIndiana Court of Appeals · 1975
  4. State v. DeprezIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
  5. In Re Marriage of RobbinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API