Legal Opinion

Childress v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 3, 1922No. 6880Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON REHEARING.

May 31, 1922.

HAWKINS, Judge.

— An opinion affirming the judgment was delivered May 3d. The bills of exception were not considered because the record failed to show that any of them had ever been filed in the court below. It is now made to appear that the bills of exception in fact bear the file mark of the clerk, and that the same were filed in ample time to receive our consideration, but by inadvertence the transcript failed to show their filing. In connection with the motion for rehearing the bills will now receive our attention.

Appellant was convicted under the second count in…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Watson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  2. Jetty v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Rylee v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Cottrell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Cunningham v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1922

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API