Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Department of Agriculture

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1952No. Docket No. 44, Calendar No. 45,136PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReid, J.

Plaintiffs are freeholders residing in the township of Homer, county of Calhoun, Michigan, in which is included part of the drainage district of the *555Lampson-Run and McIlwain extension drains, an intercounty drainage district located in Calhoun, Jackson and Hillsdale counties, which district is hereinafter referred to as the drainage district. The intercounty drainage board consists of defendant Hudson, chief of drainage, department of agriculture of the State, and the several drain commissioners of the counties aforesaid.

Plaintiffs filed a petition for a writ of certiorari in the circuit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hall v. SlaybaughMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People ex rel. Roediger v. Drain CommissionerMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  3. Dupont v. Highway CommissionersMichigan Supreme Court · 1873
  4. Lanning v. PalmerMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Ranney Refrigerator Co. v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Drainage Board v. Village of HomerMichigan Supreme Court · 1957
  2. In Re Fitch Drain No. 129Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Committee for Marshall-Not the Megasite v. City of MarshallMichigan Court of Appeals · 2024
  4. In Re Fitch Drain No. 129Michigan Supreme Court · 1956
  5. In Re Fitch Drain No. 129Michigan Supreme Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API