Tyler v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
ORTH, Judge.
We are presented on this appeal with the question:
Does Maryland or federal law prohibit the State from exercising peremptory challenges at trial in a manner systematically designed to exclude women from service on the jury?
Under the Maryland law, the answer is “yes.”
I
The Supreme Court of the United States in Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79, 106 S.Ct. 1712, 90 L.Ed.2d 69 (1986), declared that “the State’s privilege to strike individual jurors through peremptory challenges, is subject to the commands of the Equal Protection Clause.” 476 U.S. at 89, 106 S.Ct. at 1719 (footnote…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hernandez v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Murphy v. EdmondsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Attorney General of Maryland v. WaldronCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- State v. Burning Tree Club, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by60 opinions
- J. E. B. v. Alabama ex rel. T. B.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- JEB v. Alabama Ex Rel. TBSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
- Conaway v. DeaneCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Gilchrist v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.