Sewell v. Pierce

In the presentation of the appeal to the time of the filing of appellant’s motion for a rehearirlg, his contentions were that the trial court erred when he instructed the jury to find in appellee’s favor, because, he said, the testimony would have supported a finding that the relationship of landlord and tenant existed between him and appellee as to the 30 acres of land E. E. Sew-ell turned over to him, and because, he asserted, it appeared that appellee was estop-ped by the judgment in her suit against E. E. Sewell from asserting that she had a landlord’s lien on the cotton in controversy.…